Strong governance protects your registered charity status, earns donor trust, and lets your chief executive lead without second-guessing.

Most governance breakdowns at small-to-mid registered charities do not come from missing rules. They come from boards of trustees that wrote good governing documents, adopted good policies, and then never put any of it into practice. The board kept "approving" things the chief executive had already decided. The conflicts of interest policy got signed once at a trustee induction and never opened again. The line between governance and management quietly disappeared.
This guide is for chief executives and chairs of trustees who want to close that gap. It covers the six trustee duties set out in the Charity Commission's CC3 guidance, how to draw a clean line between board oversight and staff management, the six governance models worth knowing, the policies the Charity Commission and Fundraising Regulator expect you to have in place, and the mistakes that put your registered charity status at risk.
In this article:
Charity governance is the system of oversight, accountability, and decision-making that ensures a registered charity fulfils its mission and stays compliant with the law. Governance provides oversight, but it is the staff and volunteers who manage day-to-day operations. That distinction is the entire game.
The board of trustees holds ultimate legal and fiduciary responsibility for the charity. It sits at the top of every charity's organisational structure for a reason: it answers to the regulator, to HMRC (for charity tax status and Gift Aid eligibility), and to the public through the public register of charities. Governance is the trustees' job. Management is the chief executive's and staff's job. When those two roles blur, donor trust erodes and registered charity status becomes uncertain.
Misalignment between what your governing documents say and how you actually operate is one of the most common compliance problems charities face. Strong governance closes that gap. It protects your charity's status, builds donor trust, and lets the chief executive run the organisation without second-guessing.
The United Kingdom has three separate charity-law jurisdictions, and trustees must register with the regulator that covers their area of operation.
If your charity operates across borders, you may need to register with more than one regulator. The rules differ in each jurisdiction, so check the relevant regulator's guidance before you begin.
Governance matters for three concrete reasons.
Registered charity status is conditional. The Charity Commission for England and Wales (CCEW) has wide regulatory powers under the Charities Act 2011 (as amended by the Charities Act 2022), including the authority to open statutory inquiries, disqualify trustees, appoint interim managers, and in serious cases direct a charity's assets or wind it up. OSCR and CCNI have equivalent powers in their jurisdictions.
Separately, HMRC can withdraw a charity's charity tax status for governance failures that affect Gift Aid eligibility. This is distinct from CCEW registration: a charity can remain on the public register but lose the ability to reclaim Gift Aid from HMRC. A board of trustees that cannot demonstrate how it exercises oversight risks both.
Donors give to organisations they trust to spend their money on the mission. UK donors look for specific trust signals before they give: a registered charity number displayed clearly, the Fundraising Regulator badge confirming compliance with the Code of Fundraising Practice, and published annual accounts and a Trustees' Annual Report (TAR) on the public register.
UK donors are also sensitive to hidden costs. The controversy around JustGiving's suggested donor tip prompt illustrates how quickly transparency concerns translate into Trustpilot complaints and lost donations. A board that governs fundraising transparently, publishes its accounts, and operates in line with the Fundraising Regulator's Code (effective 1 November 2025) is sending a credibility signal.
Governance is also a strategic function. A board of trustees that sets clear priorities, evaluates programmes honestly, and holds the chief executive accountable for outcomes will make a bigger mission impact than a board that approves whatever appears in the meeting pack. Financial stewardship is part of this: every pound spent on overhead or fundraising costs is a pound that does not reach the cause. See how Zeffy eliminates platform fees entirely so more of what the board oversees reaches the mission.
This article provides general information about charity governance and is not legal advice. Consult a solicitor familiar with UK charity law for guidance specific to your organisation.
Every trustee of a registered charity in England and Wales carries statutory and common-law duties set out in the Charities Act 2011 and plainly summarised in the Charity Commission's guidance CC3 "The Essential Trustee: what you need to know, what you need to do". Every trustee should read CC3 on appointment. Trustees of Scottish charities have parallel duties under the Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005 (as updated by the Charities (Regulation and Administration) (Scotland) Act 2023); OSCR publishes equivalent guidance on its website.
CC3 sets out six trustee duties:
Trustees must make sure the charity's activities deliver genuine benefit to the public consistent with its stated charitable purposes. This is not a one-off check at founding; it requires ongoing review.
What a violation looks like: Spending charitable funds on activities unrelated to the mission. Allowing mission drift without formally amending the governing document. Approving programmes that benefit trustees or their associates rather than the charitable class.
How the board upholds it: Review the charity's purposes and current activities at least annually. Check that new programmes align with the governing document. When the mission needs to evolve, amend the articles of association or governing document formally rather than letting practice quietly diverge from the documents.
Trustees must act within the powers set out in the governing document (constitution, articles of association, trust deed, or CIO constitution as appropriate) and comply with all relevant law.
What a violation looks like: Spending restricted funds on general operating costs. Failing to file the annual return with CCEW, OSCR, or CCNI. Missing Companies House filings if the charity is also a company or CIO.
How the board upholds it: Maintain a governance calendar covering all required filings and reviews. Confirm the annual return, Trustees' Annual Report and Accounts (TAR), and any required independent examination or statutory audit are completed and submitted on time. Track restricted gifts in fund accounting.
Trustees must put the charity's interests first, ahead of their own and those of any connected person. This is the conflicts-of-interest duty.
What a violation looks like: Voting to award a contract to your own consultancy. Steering a grant to an organisation where a family member is on the board. Using donor data for a personal purpose.
How the board upholds it: Maintain a current conflicts of interest policy (see CCEW CC29) with annual disclosure forms. Require trustees to declare and recuse themselves from decisions where they have a financial or personal interest. Record every declaration and recusal in the minutes. Review related-party transactions annually.
Trustees must protect the charity's assets and use them prudently and only for the charity's purposes.
What a violation looks like: Approving an annual budget you have not read. Holding large unrestricted reserves without an articulated reserves policy. Taking on financial commitments without adequate cash flow.
How the board upholds it: Approve the annual budget and review quarterly management accounts. Ensure an independent examination (income between £25,000 and £1 million in England and Wales) or a statutory audit (income above £1 million, or gross assets above £3.26 million with income above £250,000) is carried out. Maintain and publish a reserves policy (see CCEW CC19) in the TAR.
Trustees must bring reasonable care, diligence, and relevant skills and experience to their role.
What a violation looks like: Attending meetings unprepared. Delegating everything to the chair without meaningful participation. Failing to ask questions about significant financial decisions.
How the board upholds it: Distribute meeting papers at least one week in advance. Require attendance minimums in the governing document. Document the questions raised and information reviewed in the minutes. Carry out an annual board self-assessment so trustees can identify gaps in their own knowledge and skills.
Trustees must comply with statutory reporting and accounting requirements and be able to demonstrate that the charity is well run.
What a violation looks like: Filing a Trustees' Annual Report that contains no meaningful narrative. Failing to publish accounts on the public register within the required timeframe. Having no records that show how significant decisions were made.
How the board upholds it: Produce a clear and honest TAR each year, including a reserves policy statement. File accounts with CCEW, OSCR, or CCNI on time (within 10 months of year-end for most charities). Keep detailed board minutes and store them securely.
Governance provides oversight, but it is the staff who manage your operations. That single sentence resolves more board dysfunction than any other framing. For a wider view of how the two layers fit together, see Zeffy's guide to charity organisational structure.
The board of trustees' job is to hire and evaluate the chief executive, approve strategy and budget, set policy, ensure legal and financial compliance, and represent the charity to the community. The staff's job, led by the chief executive, is to run programmes, manage employees and volunteers, execute the budget, and handle day-to-day operations.
When trustees reach into operations, they undermine the chief executive and confuse staff. When chief executives set strategy unilaterally, they bypass the board's oversight role and expose the charity to risk.
| Function | Board (Governance) | Executive Director and Staff (Management) |
|---|---|---|
| Mission and strategy | Approves the strategic plan and mission statement | Recommends strategy; executes the approved plan |
| Financial oversight | Approves the annual budget; reviews quarterly financials; commissions audits | Develops the budget; manages day-to-day spending; prepares financial reports |
| Executive leadership | Hires, evaluates, and compensates the executive director | The ED hires, evaluates, and supervises all other staff |
| Policy | Approves governance policies (conflict of interest, whistleblower, gift acceptance) | Implements policies and operational procedures |
| Programs | Reviews program outcomes against mission | Designs and delivers programs |
| Fundraising | Sets fundraising goals; gives and asks personally; reviews donor stewardship | Plans and executes fundraising campaigns; manages donor relationships |
Within the governance lane, a board of trustees carries six core responsibilities.
The board approves the strategic plan and reviews progress against it. The chief executive and staff typically draft the plan; the board challenges, refines, and adopts it. Plans are typically three to five years out, with annual operating priorities agreed within that framework.
This is where trustee duty four (managing resources responsibly) lives day to day. The board approves the annual budget, reviews quarterly management accounts, ensures an independent examination or statutory audit (depending on income and asset thresholds), and oversees the annual return and TAR filing. Trustees should also review donor history, giving trends, and stewardship metrics: you cannot govern fundraising you cannot see. Zeffy's free supporter management tools give boards the donor-history reporting they need for informed financial oversight.
Hiring, evaluating, and when necessary terminating the chief executive is the board's most consequential decision. Annual performance reviews, written goals, and a documented process for setting chief executive pay (including comparison with sector benchmarks such as the NCVO/ACEVO pay surveys) are governance basics. CCEW guidance CC11 "Trustee expenses and payments" covers the rules on payments to connected persons.
Trustees are typically expected to give personally and to participate in cultivation and asks. The level varies by board type, but a board that never raises money signals to staff and donors that fundraising is not a trustee priority. Trustees are also ultimately responsible for the charity's compliance with the Fundraising Regulator's Code of Fundraising Practice (effective 1 November 2025), including the new Section 9 covering online fundraising platforms.
The board ensures the charity files its annual return, maintains up-to-date registration with CCEW/OSCR/CCNI, complies with employment law, follows the restrictions attached to restricted gifts and grants, registers with the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) under UK GDPR, and holds any required licences (for example, a small society lottery licence from the local licensing authority under the Gambling Act 2005 for charity raffles). Many boards delegate the operational work to staff and an ACA/ACCA-qualified accountant but retain oversight through an audit or finance committee.
Trustees are public-facing ambassadors. They speak about the mission, recruit other supporters, and bring the community's perspective back into the boardroom.
For further reading on individual board roles, see Zeffy's guides to the charity board of trustees, charity trustees, and chair of trustees responsibilities.
The right board type depends on your charity's size, income, and stage of development. Smaller, newer charities often start with a working board and shift toward a governing board as staff capacity grows.
| Aspect | Governing boards | Advisory boards |
|---|---|---|
| Official role | Official decision-making body with legal authority | Provides recommendations and advice with no legal authority |
| Fiduciary duties | Responsible for managing assets and ensuring financial health | No fiduciary duties |
| Board discussions | Hiring the director, legal compliance, financial oversight | Advocacy, expertise, fundraising support, program assessment |
| Voting rights | Can vote on organizational matters | Limited to providing advice, no voting rights |
| Representation | Can officially speak on behalf of the organization | Advocate informally within their networks |
| Executive oversight | Holds the executive director accountable | Provides guidance, no direct oversight |
| Aspect | Working boards | Corporate boards |
|---|---|---|
| Role in strategy | Responsible for strategy and implementation | Focuses on higher-level strategy and oversight |
| Organizational presence | Community-based nonprofits with limited staff | Established nonprofits with significant resources and staff |
| Operations involvement | Involved in day-to-day operations; members handle fundraising, events, and program tasks directly | Not engaged in routine tasks; relies on the ED and staff for daily management |
| Management and governance | Line between management and governance is blurred by necessity | Clear separation from management |
Governance models describe how a board of trustees organises its work, makes decisions, and relates to staff. Most boards settle on one model in practice even if they have never named it. Here are the six worth knowing.
The traditional governance model has a board of trustees taking a hands-on approach to organisational leadership, closely resembling a working board in smaller charities where trustees actively engage in operational and administrative roles.
Trustees are deeply involved in strategic planning, budget allocation, and overseeing governance committees. A key challenge of this model is striking the right balance between managing day-to-day activities and maintaining long-term strategic oversight. This approach allows for comprehensive trustee involvement but requires careful time management to ensure that operational tasks do not overshadow strategic goals.
This governance model holds the board of trustees accountable for organisational outcomes through policy rather than direct involvement. There is a clear separation between the roles of the board and those of staff and volunteers. In the Carver model, the board:
The advisory board model offers a flexible approach to governance, complementing the main board of trustees without holding legal authority. This model brings in specialist expertise to guide the charity's strategic decisions and operations.
Advisory board members typically have deep knowledge in areas such as legal compliance, data protection, finance, or sector-specific domains. Their role extends beyond internal guidance: they often serve as external advocates, using their networks to support fundraising efforts and broaden the charity's reach.
This model is particularly useful for charities seeking to draw on diverse perspectives and specialist skills without expanding their governing board.
The board of trustees actively fundraises in the patron model. Trustees contribute to the cause and encourage those around them through events and personal networks. This model focuses on:
The cooperative model distributes decision-making authority across the full board rather than concentrating it in officers or an executive committee. Every trustee has roughly equal voice and equal accountability, and decisions are typically reached by consensus rather than narrow majority votes.
When it works best: Mission-driven cooperatives, member-led organisations, and small charities whose values explicitly include shared power. Boards that recruit on the basis of community representation often find this model aligns with their stated principles.
Key characteristics: Flat structure, consensus decision-making, shared accountability, rotating facilitation rather than a fixed chair role.
Potential drawbacks: Decision-making can slow when consensus is hard to reach. The model relies on every trustee attending and arriving prepared; absent or disengaged members stall everyone. It also requires strong meeting facilitation to keep discussions productive.
The results-based (sometimes called outcomes-based) model organises governance around measurable mission outcomes. The board sets specific, measurable goals tied to the mission and evaluates the chief executive and staff against those metrics rather than against activity or effort.
When it works best: Established charities with mature programmes and the data infrastructure to track outcomes reliably. Funder-driven environments where major grants are tied to outcome reporting also push boards toward this model.
Key characteristics: Clear outcome metrics defined annually, regular dashboards reviewed at board meetings, chief executive evaluation tied to outcome achievement, sunset reviews for programmes that are not moving the metrics.
Potential drawbacks: Metrics can crowd out hard-to-measure mission work. Boards can drift into metrics-policing rather than strategic oversight. Some outcomes take years to materialise, which strains shorter board cycles.
The Charity Commission (CCEW) expects trustees to be able to demonstrate how decisions are made and how conflicts are managed. The Fundraising Regulator's Code of Fundraising Practice (effective 1 November 2025) sets additional expectations for fundraising-related policies. Below are the policies every well-governed charity should have on the shelf.
Essential policies
Best practices
Legal duties
Defines what counts as a conflict, requires annual disclosure from every trustee and officer, and sets out the recusal process when a conflict arises at a meeting. Per CCEW CC29, this should be reviewed and re-signed annually. Record every declaration and recusal in the minutes.
The Charity Commission and the Fundraising Regulator both expect every charity working with children, young people, or adults at risk to have a written safeguarding policy, a named trustee lead for safeguarding, and a clear process for reporting serious incidents to CCEW. This is not optional. CCEW publishes safeguarding duties guidance for charity trustees on gov.uk.
CCEW requires every charity's TAR to state its reserves policy. Trustees decide the level of unrestricted reserves the charity needs, explain the rationale (typically three to six months of core operating costs), and review that figure annually. This is a UK sector norm with no direct equivalent in most international governance frameworks. CCEW CC19 "Charity reserves: building resilience" provides practical guidance.
Gives employees, volunteers, and trustees a way to report financial mismanagement, unlawful activity, or ethical violations without fear of retaliation. The policy must name the person or committee that receives reports and describe how they are handled. This is required under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998.
Charities must have a lawful basis to process donor and supporter personal data under UK GDPR (Data Protection Act 2018). Direct e-marketing by email or SMS is also governed by the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR). New Charity soft opt-in guidance from the ICO, published in 2026, is relevant for email fundraising. Register with the ICO and keep your data protection policy current.
Defines what types of gifts the charity will and will not accept (for example, restricted gifts with onerous conditions, gifts in kind of unusual items, gifts from donors with reputational risk) and the approval process for non-routine gifts. The policy should also reflect the Fundraising Regulator's Code requirements on due diligence. Note that Gift Aid does not apply to the purchase of goods or services (including raffle ticket purchases or auction lots bought at fair value). Automated Gift Aid declaration capture is built into the Zeffy fundraising platform, removing the administrative burden of manual record-keeping.
Describes how trustees set the chief executive's salary, including comparison with sector benchmarks such as the NCVO or ACEVO pay surveys and documentation of the decision in minutes. CCEW guidance CC11 covers the rules on payments to charity trustees and connected persons. Excessive or undisclosed payments can trigger a Charity Commission inquiry.
Strong governance comes from a small number of practices, applied consistently.
Map every required trustee action across the year: budget approval, independent examination or audit review, annual return and TAR filing, chief executive evaluation, policy refresh, board self-assessment, election of officers, HMRC Gift Aid claim submission. A single shared calendar prevents the "we forgot to review the accounts" surprise and keeps trustee duties on a rhythm rather than a panic.
An annual self-assessment surfaces gaps before they become problems. Ask trustees about meeting effectiveness, the quality of information they receive, the board-chief executive relationship, committee function, and their own engagement. The chair (or an independent third party for larger charities) reviews the results and brings recommendations back to the board.
Document which decisions belong to the board, which belong to the chief executive, and which require board approval above a certain financial threshold. A simple "delegation of authority" policy prevents the most common boundary problem: trustees reaching into operations and chief executives setting strategy alone.
Distribute the meeting agenda and papers at least one week in advance so trustees arrive prepared. Hold board meetings on a predictable cadence (quarterly is common; many active boards meet six to ten times a year) so issues surface early. Write clear role descriptions so every trustee knows what they are accountable for.
Your board should reflect the community and cause you serve. Recruit for diversity in ethnicity, age, gender, professional background, lived experience, and socioeconomic perspective. Adopt a non-discrimination policy. Open dialogue and varied perspectives strengthen decision-making and the charity's credibility with its beneficiaries.
Every new trustee needs an induction that covers the mission, governing document, current strategic plan, financials, governance policies, and meeting norms. Ongoing development (workshops, sector webinars, peer board conversations) keeps trustees informed about regulatory changes and emerging practice.
Free UK-specific training resources for trustees include: NCVO trustee training, Charity Excellence (free UK charity community of around 50,000 members, focused on small charities), Getting on Board (a trustee-recruitment charity), and the Charity Commission's own trustee e-learning on gov.uk.
Write term limits into the governing document so trustee turnover happens on a planned schedule rather than by surprise. Plan for officer succession 12 to 18 months in advance, including the chair and treasurer roles. The same logic applies to the chief executive: a documented succession plan protects the charity against sudden transitions.
Detailed minutes (attendance, decisions made, dissenting opinions, action items), accurate financial records, secure supporter records, and organised legal documents are the paper trail that demonstrates governance happened. A cloud-based document system with role-based access is now standard practice.
Treating the role as ceremonial, skipping preparation, or failing to document term limits in the governing document are common paths to governance breakdowns. Here are the seven mistakes that come up most often in practice, plus a UK-specific eighth.
A board of trustees that approves whatever staff bring forward without challenge is not governing; it is witnessing. Rubber-stamping is the most common failure of the duty to act with reasonable care and skill. Fix it by requiring substantive questions in every meeting, voting only after discussion, and recording dissenting opinions in minutes.
The mirror-image problem: trustees who reach into operations, weigh in on hiring decisions below the chief executive, or rewrite staff work. This undermines the chief executive and confuses the team. Fix it with a written delegation of authority policy and a chair who redirects operational questions to the chief executive.
Skipping the accounts review, never reading the management accounts, signing the conflicts of interest disclosure without thought. Each is a small lapse that compounds. Fix it with a governance calendar and an active finance or audit committee.
When the chair or chief executive leaves without a documented succession plan, the charity scrambles. Build the plan when no transition is on the horizon, not when one arrives.
New trustees who never received an induction default to passivity. They do not know the governing document, they do not know the budget, and they do not know how decisions are made. Fix it with a written induction pack and a meeting with the chair and chief executive before the new trustee's first board meeting.
Real or perceived conflicts that go undisclosed erode trust internally and create legal exposure. An annual disclosure form combined with a culture that expects trustees to flag conflicts as they arise is the protection. CCEW CC29 provides detailed guidance.
A board that all looks alike, comes from the same professional background, and shares the same blind spots will make worse decisions than a diverse board. Treat diversity as a governance quality issue, not an optics issue.
For a charitable company or Charitable Incorporated Organisation (CIO), trustees are also directors under company law. When charity law duties and company law duties conflict, charity law takes precedence. This is a genuine UK trip-hazard: a trustee who acts in the best interests of the company but contrary to the charity's purposes may still be in breach of their trustee duties. The Charity Commission's guidance is clear on this point.
Building an effective board is a recruitment, induction, and development project, not a one-time decision.
Start with a skills matrix: what expertise does the board need (finance, legal, fundraising, safeguarding, programme area, community representation), and which seats are coming open? Recruit against the gaps, not just personal networks. Use a written trustee role description that sets out time commitment, any financial contribution expectations, committee service, and meeting attendance.
A note for organisations that are not yet registered charities: unincorporated associations, Community Interest Companies (CICs), and community groups have different governance requirements. CIC directors are governed by Companies House and their CIC constitution rather than charity law; they cannot access Gift Aid unless separately HMRC-recognised. If you are moving from an unincorporated association or CIC toward registered charity status, seek guidance on the transition. CCEW's guidance on setting up a charity is a useful starting point.
Every new trustee gets an induction pack (mission, governing document, current strategic plan, recent accounts, governance policies, trustee register, committee structure) and a one-to-one meeting with the chair and chief executive before their first meeting. Pair new trustees with an experienced board colleague for the first six months.
Build short education segments into board meetings: a 15-minute briefing on a programme area, a quarterly compliance update from the accountant, an annual session on trustee duties. Send trustees to sector events (NCVO, Chartered Institute of Fundraising) and encourage them to bring back what they learn.
Most boards meet quarterly at minimum; many active boards meet six to ten times a year. Build agendas that prioritise strategic discussion over staff reports, and protect time for a trustee-only session (board without the chief executive) as well as a session with the chief executive present. For a practical look at running productive trustee meetings, see Zeffy's guide to running a trustee board meeting.
Zeffy is used by 100,000+ charities and nonprofits that have raised over £2 billion on the platform, with no platform fee, no transaction fee, and no card fee. Every pound the board oversees reaches the mission.
Charity governance is the system of oversight, accountability, and decision-making that ensures a registered charity fulfils its mission, complies with the law, and remains accountable to its regulators and the public. In the UK, governance is the responsibility of the board of trustees, who carry six statutory duties under the Charities Act 2011 as set out in the Charity Commission's CC3 guidance.
Strong governance protects registered charity status, earns donor and public trust, and enables the chief executive to manage effectively. The Charity Commission for England and Wales (CCEW), OSCR (Scotland), and CCNI (Northern Ireland) all have powers to investigate governance failures, disqualify trustees, and in serious cases wind up a charity. HMRC can separately withdraw charity tax status, affecting Gift Aid eligibility.
UK trustees carry six duties set out in the Charity Commission's CC3 guidance: (1) ensure the charity is carrying out its purposes for the public benefit; (2) comply with the governing document and the law; (3) act in the charity's best interests; (4) manage the charity's resources responsibly; (5) act with reasonable care and skill; (6) ensure the charity is accountable. Scottish trustees have parallel duties under the Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005.
Poor governance can result in the Charity Commission opening a statutory inquiry, disqualifying trustees, or appointing an interim manager to run the charity. HMRC may withdraw the charity's tax status, removing the ability to reclaim Gift Aid. Repeated governance failures can ultimately lead to the charity being wound up or its assets redirected. Donors and funders will also lose confidence in a charity whose governance failures become public.
The five modes of governance (drawn from Chait, Ryan, and Taylor's international governance framework) are: (1) fiduciary, where the board focuses on stewardship, compliance, and accountability; (2) strategic, where the board partners with the chief executive to set direction; (3) generative, where the board acts as a source of ideas and frames strategic questions; (4) representational, where the board builds relationships and advocates for the cause; and (5) operational, where the board is directly involved in the charity's work (common on small working boards). High-performing boards of trustees work across all five modes rather than staying locked in fiduciary mode alone.
The Charity Commission requires at least three unrelated trustees for charities registered in England and Wales. In practice, most small-to-mid charities have between five and twelve trustees. The right number balances the breadth of skills and community representation you need against the risk of a board too large to reach decisions efficiently. Some boards use an advisory board alongside the main board of trustees to bring in specialist expertise without expanding the governing body.


A strong Chair of Trustees is essential for any thriving charity. This guide covers the full scope of the Chair's responsibilities, the Charity Commission's six trustee duties, key officer roles, succession planning, and what UK law says about trustee pay, with a free job description template included.


A free, UK-adapted charity board meeting agenda template for trustees, CIOs, charitable companies, and community groups. Covers the six trustee duties, Trustees' Annual Report requirements, Gift Aid governance, notice, quorum, and minutes best practice for charities registered with CCEW, OSCR, or CCNI.


A well-structured board of trustees is essential to every registered charity's success. This guide covers UK trustee roles, legal duties under the Charities Act 2011, trustee indemnity insurance, best governance practices, and how to recruit and induct new trustees.
.webp)